MyFourThirds.com
The Photographic Community for the Four Thirds Photographer
MyFourThirds.comPrivate Folders > egypt 05 > 04_The Giza Pyramids

04_The Giza Pyramids

04_The Giza Pyramids
Copyright ©2005, michael hoefner HoF Win ¤ $

an ordinary tourists shot with great sky.

5 handhold landscape shots stitched. UV-filter.

Photographer: michael hoefner HoF Win ¤ $
Folder: egypt 05
Uploaded: 2005-Feb-20 13:53 EST
Current Rating: 9.00/6 (Weighted rating: 8.60)
View all ratings
Delete my rating
Copying allowed: No
Camera: Olympus E-1
Lens: Olympus 14-54mm f2.8/3.5
Lens Adapter: None
ISO: 100
Aperture: f5.6
Shutter Speed: 1/1250
Focal Length: 14
Flash: No
Tripod/Monopod: No
Critique Level: Dead Honest Critique

Comment/Rate Critique Guideline Share this Image

NO SUBJECT

Nice panorama Michael. I didn't know they had clouds in Egypt:-) Maybe a little less foreground and a bit more sky?

Steven Joscelyn HoF Win ¤ $ at 02:49 EST on 2005-Feb-21 [Reply]

NO SUBJECT

Interesting and very good pano! Interesting because it is very different from other pyramid-pictures you usually see in sand colours. I think the b/w-style makes the big difference!

Jochen Mues ¤ $ at 02:54 EST on 2005-Feb-21 [Reply]

Oh please!

This is no ordinary tourist shot...you have a great eye. Nice layers and excellent detail in the foreground sand and rocks. The clouds are a plus as well....I would like to see the color version, though....:o)

Monica Cowles HoF ¤ $ $ at 11:02 EST on 2005-Feb-21 [Reply]

NO SUBJECT

Welcome back Michael! :-)

Chris Alcala HoF ¤ at 14:33 EST on 2005-Feb-21 [Reply]

A panorama and a half!

A good feeling of being there. I like the dramatic sky.

Rex Waygood HoF ¤1 $ at 16:41 EST on 2005-Feb-25 [Reply]

NO SUBJECT

I wouldn’t say this is an ordinary tourist shot because you’ve made the pyramids look very unimpressive and quite small. :-) That makes this picture interesting I think – a different look on the pyramids with the sky and foreground more overwhelming than the pyramids.

p.t. Inactive Win ¤1 $ at 19:39 EST on 2005-Feb-25 [Reply]