banana plant
Copyright ©2004, michael hoefner HoF Win ♥ ¤ $
another musa ensete shot.
| Photographer: |
michael hoefner
HoF Win ♥ ¤ $
|
| Folder: |
flora/fauna |
| Uploaded: |
2004-Dec-19 09:39 EST |
| Current Rating: |
8.40/5 (Weighted rating: 8.22)
View all ratings
Delete my rating
|
| Copying allowed: |
No
|
| Camera: |
Olympus E-1 |
| Lens: |
Olympus 14-54mm f2.8/3.5 |
| Lens Adapter: |
None |
| ISO: |
100 |
| Aperture: |
f13 |
| Shutter Speed: |
1.6s |
| Focal Length: |
54 |
| Flash: |
No |
| Tripod/Monopod: |
Yes |
| Critique Level: |
Dead Honest Critique |
Comment/Rate
Critique Guideline
Share this Image
|
NO SUBJECT
Very nice Michael...I love the texture, detail, and composition of both "banana plant" shots....very artistic.
Doug Pitts ¤ at 10:36 EST on 2004-Dec-19 [Reply]
Almost
Personally, I would like to see a few more middle tones in this, but for a high contrast image, this is very nice. That is personal choice so that comment is not a complaint. You used a small ƒ-stop, but I wonder if ƒ/22 (or a slightly closer focus point) might have brought the nearest leaf into focus.
E. Edwin Ennor ~ (E³) HoF Win ♥ ¤ $ at 10:50 EST on 2004-Dec-19 [Reply]
Beautiful
This treatment suits the subject well. The definition of the texture is great.
I also feel the front leaf is a bit soft due to DoF and this treatment wants a sharp image.
Rex Waygood HoF ♥ ¤1 $ at 14:19 EST on 2004-Dec-19 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Very nice - it looks more like a Calla Lily than a banana leaf. :-)
p.t. Inactive Win ♥ ¤1 $ at 14:58 EST on 2004-Dec-19 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Hi Michael
I love the idea but feel it requires a higher f stop to do it the justice it deserves. Having said that I love these images you are sharing with us these days. The texture is great.
Eugene Donohoe HoF Win ♥ ¤1 $ at 15:09 EST on 2004-Dec-19 [Reply]
Your Tabletop? :o)
...has been quite well used lately? Grin! I like this one. The shape and texture are really highlighted by the conversion. This is a very 'stylish' image. Nice work.
Monica Cowles HoF ♥ ¤ $ $1 at 16:03 EST on 2004-Dec-19 [Reply]