flower of the day
Copyright ©2004, michael hoefner HoF Win ♥ ¤ $
| Photographer: |
michael hoefner
HoF Win ♥ ¤ $
|
|---|
| Folder: |
flora/fauna |
|---|
| Uploaded: |
2004-Nov-05 11:23 EST |
|---|
| Current Rating: |
8.67/3 (Weighted rating: 8.28)
View all ratings
Delete my rating
|
|---|
| Copying allowed: |
No
|
|---|
| Camera: |
Olympus E-1 |
|---|
| Lens: |
Olympus 14-54mm f2.8/3.5 |
|---|
| Lens Adapter: |
None |
|---|
| ISO: |
100 |
|---|
| Aperture: |
f22 |
|---|
| Shutter Speed: |
25s |
|---|
| Focal Length: |
25 |
|---|
| Flash: |
No |
|---|
| Tripod/Monopod: |
Yes |
|---|
| Critique Level: |
Dead Honest Critique |
|---|
Comment/Rate
Critique Guideline
Share this Image
|
NO SUBJECT
definetly better than the other one!! i'm very curious about the lighting if you care to share :))
Best..
Jamal Dadsi ♥ ¤ at 01:27 EST on 2004-Nov-06 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
hi jamal, there was a black background and very low light. also 1.5 aperture underexposed. usual postprocessing. the red shining on the upper left becomes visible after resizing and saving to jpg (?).
michael hoefner HoF Win ♥ ¤ $ at 01:40 EST on 2004-Nov-06 [Reply]
Yes it is better
I think it is better because it is all in focus. The real close in pictures are more abstract than a flower photograph, which this is, and can have a dof which is limited.
The dark background does not conflict with the subject as does the white version.
In this image the flower fills the frame beautifully and the composition is attractive.
Rex Waygood HoF ♥ ¤1 $ at 01:45 EST on 2004-Nov-06 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Excellent!! Much better than the other.. Flower and background work well together.
Best..
Eugene
Eugene Donohoe HoF Win ♥ ¤1 $ at 09:02 EST on 2004-Nov-06 [Reply]