Norske Impressioner (02)
Copyright ©2006, Horst Schmier HoF Win ♥ ¤ $
Fountain in Vigeland Parken, Oslo.
ISO 200 has been the typical fault :-((
| Photographer: |
Horst Schmier
HoF Win ♥ ¤ $
|
| Folder: |
Norske Impressioner |
| Uploaded: |
2006-Aug-28 04:55 EDT |
| Current Rating: |
9.00/1 (Weighted rating: 8.19)
View all ratings
Delete my rating
|
| Copying allowed: |
No
|
| Camera: |
Olympus E-1 |
| Lens: |
Olympus 14-54mm f2.8/3.5 |
| Lens Adapter: |
None |
| ISO: |
200 |
| Aperture: |
f/22 |
| Shutter Speed: |
0.4 |
| Focal Length: |
54 |
| Flash: |
No |
| Tripod/Monopod: |
Yes |
| Critique Level: |
Dead Honest Critique |
Comment/Rate
Critique Guideline
Share this Image
|
NO SUBJECT
very suprised that nobody comment this...for me it is works excellent...one question...aha,not question...just read your comment under the picture about iso 200.
denis grzetic HoF Win ♥ ¤ at 17:48 EDT on 2006-Aug-28 [Reply]
NO SUBJECT
Looks good. I like how The Monolith is showing at the back. Also like the square format, the “white light” coming from the top of the fountain and that the whole picture doesn’t look too smooth and slick. I guess you had meant to use ISO100, but I think this works well and I’m not sure that using lower ISO would have been better. I like the “stripes” of water and I think they perhaps would have got too blurry/soft/milky if you had used ISO100.
p.t. Inactive Win ♥ ¤ $ at 01:42 EDT on 2006-Aug-29 [Reply]
Thank you ...
denis and Caroline for stopping by and commenting.
@denis: Thanks for the accolade, glad you like it.
@Caroline: To showing the Monolith through the fountain was the intention. Glad you like it. But how does it like somebody who don´t know the location? BTW, the next posting will be The Monolith. Re photo: it takes some time for me to found the style here. First I would like to see more contrast and more details in the sky. But later I decided to make more visible the water and details from the fountain. So I´m glad you like it too.
Best wishes,
Horst Schmier HoF Win ♥ ¤ $ at 05:23 EDT on 2006-Aug-29 [Reply]